611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

LaFrontera
member support line
1-520-279-5737
M-F 5pm-8pm
24/7 weekends/holidays

AzCH Nurse Assist Line
1-866-495-6735

NAZCARE Warm Line
1-888-404-5530



SEABHS
611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

AzCH Nurse Assist Line
1-866-495-6735

NAZCARE Warm Line
1-888-404-5530


powered by centersite dot net
Health Policy & Advocacy
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Studies Relying on Brain Scans Are Often Unreliable, Analysis ShowsHow You Can Help Ease the Health Crisis in UkraineAHA News: Bystander CPR on Kids Differs by Race and EthnicityU.S. Airplane, Train and Transit Mask Mandates Extended to April 18Pooch Power: Therapy Dogs Bring Quick Relief in the ERFDA Says Gene-Edited Cattle Are Safe to EatApps: They Help Manage Health Conditions, But Few Use Them, Poll FindsAre Health Care Apps in Your Future?Sackler Family & Purdue Pharma Reach Deal With U.S. States Over Opioid CrisisU.S. Traffic Deaths Rise to Highest Level Since 2007White House Unveils New COVID Response StrategyAlexa Will Soon Put Users in Touch With Telehealth DoctorsJ&J Finalizes $26 Billion Opioid SettlementNearly Half of 500 Million Free COVID Tests Still LeftResearchers Map Out Enormous Human Family TreeCDC Close to New Guidance on COVID RestrictionsWhy Is Cancer-Linked Benzene in So Many Personal Care Products?AHA News: Donating Blood Benefits Both Receiver and Giver – And Now Is a Critical TimeFDA Warns of Rising Dangers of Unapproved Drug TianeptineToo Many Americans Are Getting 'Low-Value' Medical Tests, ProceduresGuns Outpacing Car Crashes as Leading Cause of Trauma Death for AmericansCOVID Travel Rules to Europe May Be Lifted for VaccinatedSackler Family Sweetens Opioid Settlement OfferBrut, Sure Brand Deodorants Under Recall Due to Benzene'Fact Check' Notes Work Best to Counter COVID Lies OnlinePoor Will Be Hit Hardest by a Hotter WorldPandemic Put Brakes on Lifesaving Cancer Research, CareWhen Psychiatric Care Is Far Away, Telehealth Fills the GapFDA Panel Rejects Lilly’s Cancer Drug Tested Only in China1 in 3 People Now Exposed to a Harmful PesticideHow Healthy Is Your State? New Federal Data Ranks EachRed Cross Says Blood Shortage Is Worst in a DecadeBiden Relaunches Cancer Moonshot InitiativeGruesome Warning Images on Soda Labels Could Cut ConsumptionYour Gas Stove Might Make You (and the Planet) SickBiden Administration Withdraws Vaccine Mandate for Large EmployersFree N95 Masks Begin Arriving in U.S. PharmaciesEngland to Lift Travel Restrictions for Vaccinated VisitorsMany Marijuana Vendors Aim Advertising at Kids: StudyConservatorships Keep the Homeless in Psychiatric Wards Too Long: StudyCrowded Emergency Rooms Cost Lives: StudyColonoscopy Surprise Bills Should Be Thing of the Past, Experts SayBiden Plans to Send 400 Million N95 Masks to Americans for FreeWhite House Launches Website for Free Home COVID Tests One Day Ahead of SchedulePolitics Clouds Folks' Views on COVID Rules, Global Survey ConfirmsCOVAX Program Has Now Sent 1 Billion COVID Vaccines to Poorer NationsAmid U.S. Blood Shortage, New Pressure to Ease Donor Rules for Gay MenSupreme Court Blocks Biden's Vaccine Mandate for Large EmployersWhite House May Soon Offer 'High-Quality' Masks to AmericansAmericans Should Avoid Travel to Canada: CDC
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Health Insurance
Healthcare

Studies Relying on Brain Scans Are Often Unreliable, Analysis Shows


HealthDay News
Updated: Mar 17th 2022

new article illustration

THURSDAY, March 17, 2022 (HealthDay News) -- Most brain studies that rely on MRI scans don't include enough people to provide trustworthy results, researchers say.

These brain-wide association studies use MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) to see how brain structure and function connect with personality, behavior, thinking, neurological conditions and mental illness.

Such studies require thousands of participants to get accurate results, but typically enroll just a few dozen people, according to the authors of a report published March 16 in the journal Nature.

These "underpowered" studies can show strong but incorrect associations by chance while missing real but weaker ones, the researchers explained.

"For decades, we've been highlighting the potential for MRI to assist in the clinical care — including the diagnosis, risk, response to treatment, etc. — for mental health disorders and neurologic conditions. However, the full potential has not been realized," said senior author Damien Fair. He is director of the Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.

"We now know our missteps and are redefining the required parameters, the so-called 'special sauce,' to move forward effectively," Fair added in a university news release.

For the study, the researchers analyzed data from nearly 50,000 participants in brain-wide association studies. In those studies, the median sample size was 25 — meaning half had fewer participants, half had more.

Fair's team found that associations identified in such a small sample usually failed to replicate in a separate one.

Only as the sample size rose into the thousands were associations more likely to be replicated.

Senior study author Dr. Nico Dosenbach told The New York Times that enlisting study participants can be time-consuming and costly, ranging from $600 to $2,000 an hour. Studies that use MRI often include a note about the small size.

"It's not a problem with any individual researcher or study. It's not even unique to neuroimaging," said Dosenbach, an associate professor of neurology at Washington University in St. Louis. "The field of genomics discovered a similar problem about a decade ago with genomic data and they took steps to address it."

Dosenbach noted that the U.S. National Institutes of Health began funding larger data-collection efforts and requiring data to be shared publicly. That reduces bias, he said, and genome science has gotten much better as a result.

"Sometimes you just have to change the research paradigm," Dosenbach said. "Genomics has shown us the way."

If all data from multiple small studies were pooled and analyzed together, the result would likely be reliable, he noted.

Fair said the future rests in sharing data and resources across institutions in order to make large data sets available to any scientist who wants to use them.

"This very paper is an amazing example of that," Fair said.

More information

There's more on MRI at the American Academy of Family Physicians.

SOURCE: University of Minnesota, news release, March 16, 2022