611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

member support line
M-F 5pm-8pm
24/7 weekends/holidays

AzCH Nurse Assist Line


611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

AzCH Nurse Assist Line


powered by centersite dot net
Basic InformationLatest News
Can a Computer Program Help Docs Spot Breast Cancer?Trials Show COVID Vaccines Well Worth It for Cancer PatientsCancer in Hispanics: Good News and BadRadiation Therapy for Breast Cancer May Have Long-Term Risk for the HeartCommon Form of Liver Cancer on the Rise in Rural AmericaNew Drug Combo Boosts Survival Against Aggressive Form of Breast CancerPeople With MS Have Worse Survival If Colon Cancer StrikesHaving Even a Cousin or Grandparent With Colon Cancer Raises Your Risk: StudyBlood Cancer Patients Could Benefit From COVID Booster Shot: StudyYour State's Laws Might Save Your Life If Breast Cancer Strikes9/11 First Responders Face Higher Cancer Risk 20 Years LaterChild Cancers Are Rare, But Here Are Signs to Look ForIn Cancer Patients, COVID Vaccine Immunity at 6 Months Is Similar to General PopulationWhich Cancer Patients Need a COVID Booster Shot Most?AI May Not Be Ready to Accurately Read MammogramsToo Many Antibiotics Might Raise Colon Cancer RiskPandemic Brought Big Drop in Breast Cancer Screening in Older, Low-Income WomenFewer American Adults Are Getting Malignant Brain TumorsDon't Forget to Apply Sunscreen Before & After Water FunExercise Could Help Fight 'Chemo Brain' in Breast Cancer PatientsSpotting the Signs of Deadly Melanoma Skin CancersVitamin D Might Help Prevent Early-Onset Colon CancerFar Too Few People of Color in U.S. Pancreatic Cancer TrialsDeath of Spouse Could Raise Men's Odds for Prostate CancerCancer Patients Avoiding Pot, Even as Rules on Use RelaxOne Key Question Can Help Spot Skin CancerImmune-Based Therapy May Help Some Battling Advanced Colon CancersIncomplete Polyp Removal During Colonoscopy Can Bring Cancer DangerFatigue Before Treatment Starts Might Affect Cancer SurvivalNew Drug Might Be Non-Surgical Option for Common Skin CancersHow Did the Pandemic Affect Cancer Clinical Trials?Many Black Men Missed Out on Prostate Cancer Care During PandemicMixed Progress Against Cancers in Teens, Young AdultsBogus Info on Cancer Common Online, and It Can HarmScreening Often Misses Endometrial Cancer in Black WomenLong Distance to Care Can Mean Worse Outcomes for Young Cancer PatientsAlcohol Tied to 740,000 Cancer Cases Worldwide in 2020Cancer Survivors Fared Better Financially After ObamacarePandemic Delays in Screening Mean More Breast Cancer Deaths Ahead: StudyObese Men May Have Better Survival With Advanced Prostate CancerMost Cancer Screenings Make Big Rebound After Pandemic DeclineAdding MRI to Screening Can Cut Prostate Cancer Overdiagnosis in HalfU.S. Deaths From Cancer Continue to DeclineAlmost All Cancer Patients Respond Well to COVID-19 VaccinesCould Too Many Antibiotics Raise Your Odds for Colon Cancer?Too Little Sunlight, Vitamin D May Raise Colon Cancer RiskShining a Light on SunscreensGap in Breast Cancer Survival for Black, White Patients Shrinks, But Not by EnoughCost a Barrier to Cervical Cancer Screening for Many U.S. WomenMost Americans Don't Follow Diets That Could Prevent Cancer
LinksBook ReviewsSelf-Help Groups
Related Topics

Medical Disorders
Pain Management

Could a DNA Blood Test Spot a Range of Hidden Cancers?

HealthDay News
by By Alan Mozes HealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jun 25th 2021

new article illustration

FRIDAY, June 25, 2021 (HealthDay News) -- Could a new one-and-done blood test designed to detect as many as 50 different types of cancer become a diagnostic game changer?

Yes, say researchers, who report the method appears accurate and reliable at identifying and locating cancer, including some kinds for which there are now no effective screening methods.

"[The test] sets the stage for a new paradigm of screening individuals for multiple cancer with a single blood test, as opposed to the current situation where we screen for individual cancers," said study leader Dr. Eric Klein, chairman of the Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute at the Cleveland Clinic.

The new blood test looks for the presence of so-called cell-free DNA (cfDNA), a telltale sign of cancerous tumors.

The latest round of testing involved roughly 2,800 participants already diagnosed with cancer and 1,250 who were healthy. The results were dramatic, Klein said.

"Across all stages [of cancer], the test correctly identified when cancer was present in 51.5% of cases," he said.

The false positive rate -- meaning the frequency with which a test incorrectly identified disease when there wasn't any -- was just 0.5%, Klein added.

Broken down stage by stage -- with stage 1 being early disease and stage 4 being very advanced cancer -- the blood test delivered far better results for later-stage disease.

For example, across all cancers, Klein said, the blood test had a "sensitivity rate" of 90.1% with stage 4 illness. That figure dipped to 77% for stage 3 cancer; 40.4% for stage 2, and 16.8% for stage 1.

Still, Klein pointed to the test's value as a means for discovering cancers that elude all the diagnostic tools now available. Among those are cancers of the esophagus, liver and pancreas.

Across all stages of disease, the new test actually had a far higher sensitivity rate with elusive cancers than with ones for which there are already effective screening tools.

For example, the test had a sensitivity rate of 33.7% in diagnosing all-stage breast, bowel, cervical or prostate cancer, all of which can be screened by other means. But that figure jumped to 65.6% with hard-to-spot esophageal, liver and pancreatic cancers.

Ultimately, Klein's team concluded that the test is both accurate and useful enough to be deployed as a screening tool for individuals who are at high risk for cancer -- including those age 50 and up -- whether or not symptoms arise.

The findings were published June 25 in the Annals of Oncology.

GRAIL, Inc. -- the Menlo Park, Calif.-based test manufacturer, which funded the study -- has made the blood test available on a prescription basis. The immediate goal is to add to, rather than replace, available tests.

For now, it is meant to supplement standard screening tests, such as colonoscopy, mammography and the prostate-specific antigen test, Klein said.

After reviewing the study results, Dr. Julie Gralow, chief medical officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, characterized the findings as "exciting" but cautioned that the test is "not yet ready for prime time."

"The sensitivity of the [test] for the earliest stage cancers -- like stage 1 -- is low," she said, and that's where death rates can best be decreased.

"Being able to detect a cancer that is already clinically apparent -- which is how many of the cancer patients in this study were identified -- is not what we want or need," Gralow said. "We need a [test] that will detect cancer before it is obvious, or in the case of those cancers for which we have screening, before a mammogram will see it, for example."

At the same time, Gralow said the new screening approach is unique, given "that it can test for dozens of cancers with one blood draw, and it is using circulating cancer DNA to detect the presence of cancer."

She said that the approach is attempting to remedy a very real problem.

"We do not have good screening for some of the most deadly types of cancer," Gralow said, adding that the blood test offers promise that headway can be made in uncovering those cancers earlier and more easily.

More information

For more about on current cancer screening options and the importance of early diagnosis, visit the American Cancer Society.

SOURCES: Eric Klein, MD, chairman, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio; Julie Gralow, MD, chief medical officer, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Va.; Annals of Oncology, June 25, 2021