611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

Health Choice Integrated Care crisis Line
1-877-756-4090

NurseWise 24-Hour Crisis Line
1-866-495-6735

NAZCARE Warm Line
1-888-404-5530



SEABHS
611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

NurseWise 24-Hr Crisis Line
1-866-495-6735

NAZCARE Warm Line
1-888-404-5530


powered by centersite dot net

Getting Started
Here are some forms to get started. These can be printed and brought with you so that you can pre-fill out some known info ahead of time. More...


Health Sciences
Resources
Basic InformationLatest News
Brains May Be as Unique as Fingerprints'Heading' Soccer Balls May Be Bad for BalanceScientists Target Cellular 'Fountain of Youth' to Extend Mouse Life SpanThose At-Home DNA Tests Are an Imperfect ScienceScientists Spot Gene Linking Down Syndrome, Early Alzheimer'sMassive Study Finds Same Genes Drive Many Psychiatric ConditionsThyroid Cancer Survivors at Risk for Heart DiseaseBetter Diet, Bigger Brain?Primary Care Providers Have Mixed Views on Genetic TestsFDA Targets Clinics Offering Unapproved Stem Cell TherapiesRestless Legs Linked to Brain ChangesContact Sports May Alter the Brain, Scans SuggestJust One Concussion Could Raise Parkinson's RiskLove Your Hair Color? You Have Over 100 Genes to Thank.Too Much Sitting Could Raise Brain RisksBusting Myths Surrounding Cancer and Genetic TestingTough Times Can Leave Their Mark on the Older BrainSugar-Craving Gene Helps Lower Body Fat, But Has DownsideMajor Project Completes Genetic 'Map' of 33 CancersOlder Brains Replenish Cells Just Like Young Brains: StudyScientists Say They Discovered a 'New Organ' in the BodyNew Technology Gives 'Feeling' to Prosthetic ArmsBlood Pressure Check? There May Soon Be an App for ThatHealth Tip: What You Can Learn From Genetic TestingAs Stroke 'Liquefies' Brain Tissue, Lasting Harm May SpreadClues to Parkinson's May Be Shed in TearsFDA Approves First Blood Test to Evaluate Potential ConcussionsLimited Evidence for Effect of Cranial Electrical StimulationAutism, Bipolar and Schizophrenia Share Genetic SimilaritiesDo Over-the-Counter Painkillers Alter Emotions, Reasoning?Specific White Matter Patterns Linked to Youth PsychopathologyA New Way to Thwart Disease-Spreading MosquitoesFirst Monkeys Cloned From Process That Created 'Dolly' the SheepNeil Diamond Reveals Parkinson's DiagnosisBrain Is Susceptible to Acute MI, Chronic Heart FailureBrain Zaps May Help Curb Tics of Tourette SyndromeScientists Turn Skin Cells Into Muscle Cells, a Potential Boon for ResearchRobot Training Improves Gait Stability in Parkinson'sCould an Electric Pulse to the Brain Recharge Your Memory?Genes Start Mutating Soon After Life Begins, Study FindsMore Men Than Women With Parkinson's Have Caregivers'Fountain of Youth' Gene Discovered in Secluded Amish CommunityLRRK2 Variants Linked to Lower Age at Onset of Parkinson'sKnowing Too Much About Your Genes Might Be RiskyOverlapping Surgery Appears Safe in Neurosurgical ProceduresDo I Know Ewe?Daytime Wounds May Heal Faster Than Nighttime OnesHuman vs. Animal Brainpower: More Alike Than You Might ThinkResilient Brain Connections May Help Against Alzheimer'sConcerns Surround Use of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Medical Disorders
Mental Disorders
Mental Health Professions

Scientists Support Genome Editing to Prevent Disease


HealthDay News
Updated: Oct 4th 2017

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, Oct. 4, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Many basic scientists and clinical researchers support somatic genome editing in adults for prevention of serious disease but not for human enhancement; they also believe the public should be consulted before any clinical application of germline gene editing proceeds, according to survey results published online Oct. 3 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics.

Kiran Musunuru, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, and colleagues surveyed about 300 attendees at an American Heart Association conference to examine their opinions on somatic and germline gene editing (GGE). Most of the respondents were basic scientists (74 percent) or clinical researchers (12 percent), with few clinical practitioners (6 percent).

The researchers found that 80 percent of respondents supported somatic genome editing in adults to prevent serious diseases. Sixty-nine percent would opt to receive a safe, one-shot genome-editing therapy that would permanently reduce coronary heart disease risk. However, 83 percent were opposed to use of somatic genome editing to acquire desired traits. With respect to human GGE, 68 percent supported in vitro research that would not culminate in pregnancy, and most supported public funding of such research. Sixty-one percent supported use of GGE by parents if there were no other means to have a healthy biological child; opinions were evenly split about the acceptability of using GGE for reducing the risk of a child having a serious medical condition. Seventy-two percent opposed GGE if the general public was not asked for their opinions of the issue.

"The results were revealing and highlight the need to broadly engage the public and solicit the opinions of various constituencies before proceeding with clinical germline genome editing," the authors write.

Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)