|
Basic InformationLatest NewsScientists Create Embryos With Cells From Monkeys, Humans'Game of Thrones' Study Reveals the Power of Fiction on the MindScientists Create Human Tear Glands That Cry in the LabAHA News: How Grief Rewires the Brain and Can Affect Health – and What to Do About ItCould Taking a Swing at Golf Help Parkinson's Patients?Autopsy Study May Explain Why Some COVID Survivors Have 'Brain Fog'Gene Study Probes Origins of Addison's DiseaseCould a Common Prostate Drug Help Prevent Parkinson's?AHA News: Hormones Are Key in Brain Health Differences Between Men and WomenNerve Drug Might Curb Spinal Cord Damage, Mouse Study SuggestsIs There a 'Risk-Taking' Center in the Brain?AHA News: Dr. Dre Recovering From a Brain Aneurysm. What Is That?Can 2 Nutrients Lower Your Risk for Parkinson's?New Clues to How Cancers Originate in the BrainBrain May Age Faster After Spinal Cord InjuryScans Reveal How COVID-19 Can Harm the BrainWhat Loneliness Looks Like in the BrainNeurologists Much Tougher to Find in Rural AmericaCOVID-19 Survival Declines When Brain Affected: StudyAs Testing Costs Rise, Neurology Patients May Skip ScreeningGene Therapy Shows No Long-Term Harm in Animals: StudyCould Gene Therapy Cure Sickle Cell Disease? Two New Studies Raise HopesCocoa Might Give Your Brain a Boost: StudyLockdown Loneliness Could Worsen Parkinson's SymptomsChildhood Lead Exposure Tied to Brain Changes in Middle AgeStaying Social Can Boost Healthy 'Gray Matter' in Aging BrainsDNA Analysis Might Reveal Melanoma RiskGenetics Might Explain Some Cases of Cerebral PalsyDiabetes Drug Metformin May Protect the Aging BrainNew Research Links Another Gene to Alzheimer's RiskYour Sex Affects Your Genes for Body Fat, Cancer, Birth WeightExperimental Drug Shows Promise Against ALSCould Gene Therapy Stem the Damage of Parkinson's?Genetic Research May Help Identify Causes of StillbirthBlood Test Heralds New Era in Alzheimer's DiagnosisMore Clues to the Genes Behind Hearing LossScientists Move Closer to Mapping Entire Human GenomeBlood Test May Reveal Concussion Severity With Accuracy of Spinal TapDeep Brain Stimulation May Slow Parkinson's, Study FindsStroke, Confusion: COVID-19 Often Impacts the Brain, Study ShowsYour Genes May Affect How You'll Heal If WoundedEven Without Concussion, Athletes' Brains Can Change After Head Jolts: StudyHealthDay In-Depth The AI Revolution: For Patients, Promise and Challenges Ahead">HealthDay In-Depth The AI Revolution: For Patients, Promise and Challenges AheadBlood Test Might Predict Worsening MSKeto Diet Might Change Your Gut in More Ways Than OneParkinson's Patient Improving After First-Ever Stem Cell TherapyKey Areas of the Brain Triggered in Recent Heart Attack SurvivorsFirst Good Evidence That Brain Hits 'Replay' While You SleepSome NFL Players May Be Misdiagnosed With Brain Disease: StudyGreenhouse Gases Bad for Your Brain Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews |
| |
by William Lyons Routledge, 2001 Review by Mazen Maurice Guirguis on Jan 17th 2002 Over the last two decades, the nature of the mind
has enjoyed an ever-increasing share of the philosophical literature. But the
enthusiasm has not been confined just to philosophy. Psychologistswho until
recently have shunned consciousness as a topic worthy of serious studyare
finally beginning to recognize the significance of the questions with which
philosophers have been struggling for years: What is the relationship between
mind and body? How can sentience be a by-product of what is essentially an
electrochemical engine? Will the intentional vocabulary of the propositional
attitudesthose couched in the language of beliefs, hopes, desires, fears,
intuitions, etc.survive a mature theory of human cognition?
Even a brief survey of the proposed approaches to
these questions will show remarkable complexity and diversity of opinion, and
the archive continues to grow daily. Perhaps not surprisingly, there is a story
to be told here, for the suggested solutions often represent discernible
intellectual traditions and schools of thought, which, in turn, have their
genesis in unique social, scientific, and technological trends. William Lyons
in Matters of the Mind thoughtfully tells this story, recounting the
perspectival shifts that scholars have undergone in contemplating the nature of
mentality.
Starting with the historically persistent dogma that
posits a soul separate from the body, Lyons shows how this kind of theistic dualism
has been given its basic philosophical shape by the work of René Descartes. The
Cartesian two worlds view (the world of physical things and the world
of non-physical souls and thoughts) is now considered to be a
relic of an old, unsophisticated conception of the mind that is incompatible
with todays more secular sentiments. True as this may be, it does not require
much imagination or insight to endlessly criticize, belittle, blame, or plain
bad-mouth an admittedly problematic hypothesis without taking the time to think
about its place in the history of ideas. Lyons does not make this
mistake. He remarksquite correctly, I thinkthat with something approaching
extreme perversity, Descartes is now best remembered through the fact that most
twentieth-century accounts of mind define themselves in opposition to what they
take to be Descartes account (p. 4).
Along with logical positivisms effort to reduce all
folk psychological idioms to statements of physics, this centurys most
conspicuous attempt to dispel Descartes two-world view came from the behaviorist
faction. Logical positivism regards the task of philosophy as
chiefly comprising the investigation of the logico-conceptual foundations of
the natural sciences; behaviorism is the school of psychology in which
an organisms observable (re)actions are the primary topic of interest, and
learning new stimulus-response associations, whether by classical conditioning
or reinforcement principles, is deemed the most important kind of behavior to
scrutinize. Lyons discusses both doctrines in chapter two, but emphasizes behaviorism,
especially in regards to its rise and impact on psychology. Though behaviorism
is now every bit as defunct as Cartesian dualismin part because it could not
explain one of the most salient aspects of thought, the fact that contentful
mental states are generally known to the subject who has them without appeal to
behaviorist or otherwise external evidenceLyons nevertheless argues that much
has been gained by the movement. In particular, behaviorism introduced a more
objective standpoint into the way psychological inquiry is conducted, which
was to become the norm of all future accounts of mind in both philosophy and
psychology (p. 78).
The demise of behaviorism came at a time when
important advances were being made in the area of neurophysiology. Scientists
started to know more about how the brain functions, and their discoveries have
at least partly motivated various mind-body identity theories, which
equate either types or tokens of thoughts with specific brain states, and, a
little later, the more polemical attitude of eliminative materialismthe
view that, while folk psychological descriptions and explanations may be
practically indispensable, mentalistic categories do not actually denote anything
real. In chapter three, Lyons takes us through the rise and fall of such
positions, along with their similarities and differences, advantages and
shortcomings, effects and repercussions.
Mind-body identity and eliminativist materialism
sprung from what was a scientific development: a surge in our understanding of
the central nervous system. The next epic in the history of philosophy of mind,
according to Lyons, is rooted in what was essentially a technological
milestone. We may date the advent of the computer age to the late seventies, at
roughly the same time when functionalisma theory that uses the computer
metaphor to describe the mind as the brains softwarestarted to
flourish in most North-American philosophy departments. Throughout the eighties
there was something of a battle between functionalism and eliminativism, with
the latter losing ground and the former becoming more established.
Functionalism remains popular today, but one significant problem for this
approachreviewed by Lyons in chapter fouris an apparent inability to account
for the subjectivity of conscious experience. Lyons talks about the problem
of consciousness in chapter five, outlining the different, and often
inconsistent, points of view on offer. He concludes the book with a comment on
what he believes to be lessons learnt and lessons lost.
Lyons does not propose or defend any new theses, and
this makes his book largely an expository one. But lest anyone supposes that
exposition leaves little room for originality, Matters of the Mind is
certainly evidence to the contrary. Perhaps the best feature of the book is its
parallel portrayal of the relevant themes in philosophy and psychology.
While the two disciplines differ in methodology and scope, they have many
points of contact and continue to manifest a symbiotic relationship of mutual
benefit. What Lyons does is identify the main connections and arrange them into
a coherent reconstruction of the forces that have shaped theories of mind over
the past five centuries. He does not assume any technical knowledge on the part
of his audience, but takes the timesometimes in the main text, sometimes in
footnotesto explain any philosophical or psychological concept that may be
unfamiliar to laity. Although this may prove distracting to the advanced
student, it makes the work much more accessible to the general public.
The reader will find many wonderful surprises in Matters
of the Mind. It starts with a Chronology of Modern Philosophy of Mind,
which lists all the main events that have contributed to the subject in recent
history, starting in 1890 with William James publication of Principles of
Psychology, and ending in 1999 with the inauguration of the Soul Catcher
2025 project (aimed at developing an implantable computer chip capable of
recording the entire sum of a persons visual experiences over a lifetime). The
reader will also find helpful illustrations, passages from newspaper articles,
diagrams, brief biographies, amusing anecdotes, and a virtual picture-gallery
of many prominent philosophers and psychologists. These different elements
combine to make a thoroughly enjoyable and informative volume. Matters of
the Mind is recommended for everyone, but especially the beginning student
who wants a birds-eye-view of the entire field.
©
2002 Mazen Maurice Guirguis
Mazen
Maurice Guirguis, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Philosophy, University of
British Columbia |