|
Basic InformationLatest News'Miracle' Young Blood Infusion Treatments Unproven, Potentially Harmful: FDAPossible Parkinson's 'Pandemic' Looms: ReportScience Puzzling Out Differences in Gut Bacteria Around the World'Mind-Reading' AI Turns Thoughts Into Spoken WordsEat What You Want and Still Stay Slim? Thank Your GenesGood News, Bad News on Levodopa for Parkinson's DiseaseNature or Nurture? Twins Study Helps Sort Out Genes' Role in DiseaseBeing Bullied May Alter the Teen BrainFDA Warns Companies on Dangerous, Unapproved Stem Cell TreatmentsGene Tweaking Prevented Obesity in MiceApproach That New Gene Testing Kit With CautionResearch on Almost 2,000 Brains Brings Insight Into Mental IllnessRestoring Hair Growth on Scarred Skin? Mouse Study Could Show the WayParkinson's Gene Therapy Wires New Brain CircuitsNext for Disabling Back Pain? New Discs From Patients' Own CellsSkin 'Glow' Test Might Someday Spot Disease Risk EarlyComputer-Brain Link Helps 'Locked In' People Chat, Surf WebCould a Natural Protein Help Fight Obesity?Blood Test May One Day Help Track Concussion RecoveryThe Bigger the Brain, the Bigger the Tumor Risk?Gene Therapy for Parkinson's Symptoms Shows PromiseCould Same-Sex Couples Have Babies With Shared DNA? Study Hints It's PossibleMany Americans Curious, But Wary, About Gene TestingAHA: New Report Explores Genes Behind Congenital Heart DiseaseScientists Find 500 More Genes That Influence Blood PressureALS Affects the Mind, Not Just the BodyScientists Finally Get Around to Finding Procrastination's Home in the BrainGene 'Editing' in Dog Study Shows Promise for Kids With Muscular DystrophyGut Enzyme Could Help Solve U.S. Blood Shortages'Fat' Mouse Test Failure Yields New Obesity ClueIs Evolution of the Human Brain to Blame for Some Mental Disorders?Scientists Trace Link Between Head Injuries and Parkinson'sAHA: Scientists May Have Cleared Gene Therapy HurdleAlmost 1,300 Genes Seem Tied to Academic SuccessBrains May Be as Unique as Fingerprints'Heading' Soccer Balls May Be Bad for BalanceScientists Target Cellular 'Fountain of Youth' to Extend Mouse Life SpanThose At-Home DNA Tests Are an Imperfect ScienceScientists Spot Gene Linking Down Syndrome, Early Alzheimer'sMassive Study Finds Same Genes Drive Many Psychiatric ConditionsThyroid Cancer Survivors at Risk for Heart DiseaseBetter Diet, Bigger Brain?Primary Care Providers Have Mixed Views on Genetic TestsFDA Targets Clinics Offering Unapproved Stem Cell TherapiesRestless Legs Linked to Brain ChangesContact Sports May Alter the Brain, Scans SuggestJust One Concussion Could Raise Parkinson's RiskLove Your Hair Color? You Have Over 100 Genes to Thank.Too Much Sitting Could Raise Brain RisksBusting Myths Surrounding Cancer and Genetic Testing Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews |
| |
by Pierre Baldi MIT Press, 2001 Review by John Caulfield, Ph.D. on Oct 16th 2001  Some 31 years ago, Alvin Toffler published a very influential
nook entitled Future Shock.
Its warning was that the world was changing so fast that humans,
who evolved for a much less rapid adaptation, would begin to have
trouble adapting, Today, Ludism and fundamentalism thrive in advanced
countries. His prophecy has been fulfilled.
In almost the same spirit, Pierre Baldi has written this book
to prepare readers for what is about to happen in the 21st
Century - especially as it impacts our concepts of what we humans
are. The day I wrote this, I heard a radio commentator noting
that the artificial heart success just being celebrated gave him
"the creeps." The heart is so central to a human that
it should not be made of plastic. Phone-in listeners agreed enthusiastically
that such things need to be stopped. If only they had read Baldi's
book!
Providing the necessary background at a high school level, Baldi
deals briefly with the history of what he calls "decentering"
wherein first the sun, then human bodies, and finally conscious
thought have been transformed from central to peripheral positions
in the universe.
Molecular biology is his entry point into the 21st
century. Most of the material will be familiar to everyone reading
this review. But, his note on the relationship between the growth
of tomatoes and the growth of cancers was new and quite stimulating
to me.
Issues affecting human reproduction come next - Viagra, "test
tube babies," sexless reproduction, reproductionless sex,
sex selection, Siamese twins, cloning, life extension, DNA manipulation,
children rearing clones of their parents are among topics discussed.
Although it is barely related to his theme, Baldi includes a brief
discussion of the Internet. Moore's law, and so forth. Even here,
developments are explosive and (to some) threatening.
He then turns to "The Last Frontier: the Brain." Here,
Baldi seems to me uncharacteristically conservative. Many researchers
(myself included) think that they already understand the broad
outline of human perception, consciousness, self consciousness,
emotions, and mystic experiences. If we are right, our view of
what a human is changes drastically. I argue that humanity does
not lose its grandeur in the process, but I avoid discussing such
things outside the company of scholars.
All of this challenges ethics in two ways. First, it challenges
the external basis for ethics - an external and eternal ruler
and lawmaker. Second, it challenges us to deal with totally new
situations for which there are no accepted ethical standards.
Baldi then speculates on what he calls "the end of natural
evolution." We can now interfere with natural evolution in
ways our grandparents could never have dreamed. The great outcry
against genetically modified plants is certainly politically motivated,
but it works so well because we fear the end of natural evolution.
Nameless scientists take on the role of God himself in directing
evolution (provided God indulges in evolution at all according
to the user's beliefs).
Like it or not, this Brave New World is no longer the stuff
of fiction. Baldi hopes to prepare readers for it.
© 2001 John Caulfield
H. John Caulfield,
Distinguished Research Professor, Fisk University, Nashville,
TN.
This review first appeared online Sept 1, 2001 |
