|
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest NewsCrowdsourcing Raises Billions for Families Hit Hard by Medical BillsBiden Says He Will Release All Vaccine Doses After Taking Office1 in 4 Doctors Harassed Online, Study FindsMoves, Evictions Often Trigger Harmful Breaks in Health Care: StudySome Americans Can't Access Telemedicine, Study ShowsHealth Care After COVID: The Rise of TelemedicineNeurologists Much Tougher to Find in Rural AmericaAs Testing Costs Rise, Neurology Patients May Skip Screening1 in 7 Studies in Nutrition Journals Have Food Industry TiesUSPS Cuts Could Pose Harm If Mail-Order Meds Delayed: Study329 Americans Are Injured by Guns Every Day: StudySome Talc Products Contain Asbestos: StudyAHA News: Why People Fear Performing CPR on Women – and What to Do About It'Green Prescriptions' May Backfire for SomePreventive Health Care Falls by Wayside During PandemicSmoking Bans Don't Work If Not Enforced, NYC Study FindsTelemedicine Out of Reach for Those Who Can't Get OnlineLies Spread on Social Media May Mean Fewer Vaccinations1 in 3 Americans Prescribed Inappropriate DrugsColon Cancer Screening Should Start at Age 45: Task ForceWhat Will It Take for People to Embrace a COVID Vaccine?What Will Convince Americans to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine?CDC Recommends Face Masks in All Public Transportation SettingsInsured Patients Are Getting Surprise Bills After ColonoscopiesBogus 'Cure' Claims Have U.S. Consumers Snapping Up CBD ProductsPediatricians' Group Tackles Racism in Health CareAs Virtual Doctor Visits Spike, Concerns About Equity, Missed Diagnoses GrowWas FDA Lax in Approving Opioids Too Easily?Allowing More Gay Men to Donate Corneas Could Save Sight for Thousands: StudyAccuracy of COVID-19 Antibody Tests Varies Widely, Study FindsSevere Mental Illnesses Often Overlooked at Hospital Admission: StudyCould Drones Delivering Defibrillators Save Lives?Statins Going Generic Saved Medicare BillionsAHA News: Looming Wave of Evictions, Housing Instability Pose Threat to HealthAHA News: Health Apps Pose Privacy Risks, But Experts Offer This AdviceCould You Save a Life After Mass Violence? Most Americans Say NoGun Violence Costs U.S. Health Care System $170 Billion AnnuallyWith COVID Vaccine in Works, 1 in 5 Americans Doesn't Believe in ShotsTelehealth Skyrocketing Among Older AdultsPharmacists in All U.S. States Can Give Kids Childhood ShotsAHA News: COVID-19's Economic Fallout Expands Food Insecurity, as Groups Scramble to HelpCOVID-19 Clinical Trials Lack Diversity, Researchers SayLook Beyond Fossil Fuels to Curb Air PollutionTelemedicine Is Here: Experts Offer Tips for SeniorsMany Older Adults Can't Connect With Telehealth: StudyAHA News: High-Speed Internet Offers Key Connection to Health, But Millions Lack It11 States Could Face ICU Doc Shortages as Coronavirus Cases SurgeWill the Telemedicine Boom Outlast the Pandemic?Yet Another Study Finds Vaccines Are SafeIn Rush to Publish, Most COVID-19 Research Isn't Reliable, Experts Say Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews |
| |
by Lucy Johnstone Brunner-Routledge, 2000 Review by Christian Perring, Ph.D. on Jun 26th 2003 
Lucy Johnstone's Users and
Abusers of Psychiatry takes a critical look at current psychiatric
treatment, mostly in the UK. It is a
substantial book, with nearly 300 pages, 11 chapters and 25 pages of
footnotes. It combines personal
narratives with discussion of psychiatric theory, sociological data about
trends in psychiatric care, and some current controversies. Johnstone does not doubt the existence of
mental illness, but she is dissatisfied with the current reductionist approach
to its conceptualization and treatment, which she argues does not serve
patients well. Her approach is clearly
influenced by sociological views about mental illness that emphasize
medicalizing people's psychological problems can disempower them and confine
them to a "sick role." She is
also very critical of the reliance on psychiatric medications, which she argues
are often unhelpful and even dangerous.
Johnstone clearly believes that we
would serve people better if we could provide them with individual
psychotherapy, and we could do more to change their family interactions and
even the structure of society. She
emphasizes the role of gender in causing mental disorders and argues that
sexism in psychiatry leads stereotypical female psychological conditions to be
classified as mental illnesses. Her
work is informed by a large body of work from critical psychiatry and a more
general left or liberal perspective, including the Glasgow Media
Group, Barham and Hayward's Relocating
Madness, Peter Breggin's many attacks on psychiatric medication and ECT,
Foudraine's Not
Made of Wood, and even Richard Warner's Recovery
from Schizophrenia. However,
most of all her work is based on her own observations of the British
psychiatric system and studies she has collected over the years. She makes an impressive case for her views,
since even if one is unconvinced by one or two pieces of evidence she presents,
the effect of the whole body of evidence she provides is overwhelming. She may not have proved that the medical
model to treating mental illness is intrinsically worthless, but she does
enough to throw a great deal of doubt on its value, and she shows that it is
folly to rely exclusively on such a model to the exclusion of others. She also gives strong reason to believe that
whatever the best model might be, the current system is not very successful in
helping people diagnosed with mental illness, and in many cases may be making
their lives worse.
There is in Britain a relatively
thriving movement of researchers and activists with a critical attitude towards
mainstream psychiatric theory and treatment.
In the US, there are many critics of psychiatry, and there are a number
of psychiatric survivor/consumer groups, as well as many Internet websites and
email lists devoted to discussing the excesses and dangers of medications. However, all this activity in the US is too
fragmentary to be described as a cohesive movement. With the pharmaceutical industry having so much influence though
providing grants to groups such as the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill
and having direct access into people's homes through direct-to-consumer
advertising, the mainstream view of mental illness has a powerful hold over the
public. Users and Abusers of
Psychiatry is a model of a sophisticated critique of the mainstream medical
model, showing a good understanding of the complexities of psychiatry theory
and an impressive knowledge of the way that treatment actually affects
people. It is also written clearly, and
with its repeated use of the cases of particular individuals and their stories,
should be accessible to a general readership.
There is no equivalent book that addresses the state of mental health
treatment in the USA, and that is a real shame. While there are major differences between health care in the
Britain and other countries, Johnstone's book does have enough general
discussion in it to be relevant to readers outside of the UK. I recommend it highly.
© 2003 Christian Perring.
All rights reserved.
Christian Perring, Ph.D., is Chair of the Philosophy
Department at Dowling College, Long Island, and editor of Metapsychology
Online Review. His main research is on philosophical issues in
medicine, psychiatry and psychology.
|