|
Basic InformationLookupsLatest NewsVision Problems? Here's a Guide to Which Specialist Is Right for YouShould Your Child Get a COVID Test?New Hope Against Diseases Marked by Progressive Scarring of Lung TissueAHA News: What Heart and Stroke Patients Should Know About COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID Pandemic Shortened U.S. Life Expectancy by More Than a YearShorter COVID Quarantine for College Athletes a Good Idea, Study FindsWhat Happened to the Flu This Year?3 Steps Could Nearly Eliminate COVID Infections on College Campuses: StudyPharmacy Chains Ready to Supply COVID-19 Vaccines to AmericansI've Already Had COVID-19, Do I Need the Vaccine?What Will COVID-19 Look Like Years From Now?First Computer Model of Entire COVID Virus Will Aid ResearchStopping Common Heart Meds Could Be Risky for Kidney PatientsU.S. COVID Vaccine Rollout Nears 1 Million Doses Per DayJohnson & Johnson's One-Dose COVID Vaccine Promising in Early TrialLockdowns' Benefits for Air Quality Weren't as Big as Thought: StudyPeople's 'Microbiomes' Might Influence COVID-19 Severity: StudyNew Insights Into How COVID-19 Damages the BrainCollege Campuses Are COVID 'Superspreaders,' Study FindsStuck at Home, Suffering With COVID? Experts Offer Guidance on CareCOVID Daily Death Toll Sets New U.S. Record, Soars Past 4,400AHA News: Registries Could Offer Insight Into COVID-19's Impact on College Athletes' HeartsResearch Reveals Why COVID Pneumonia Is More DeadlyPandemic Is Tied to Big Rise in U.S. Heart DeathsCommon Diabetes Meds Tied to Serious COVID-19 ComplicationPlant-Based Diet Brings Better 'Microbiome,' Healthier LifeAnswering Your Qs on the New COVID VaccinesEven Mild Cases of COVID Can Leave 'Long-Haul' Illness, Study ShowsCommon Blood Pressure Meds Won't Up Risks for COVID Patients: StudySix Months Later, Most Wuhan COVID Survivors Still Have Health IssuesHealth Officials Work to Speed Up U.S. COVID Vaccine RolloutAllergists' Group Offers Guidelines on COVID-19 VaccinesFacebook Posts Big Drivers in Vaccine Resistance, Study FindsBlack Patients at Higher Risk When Type 1 Diabetes and COVID CombineBiden Says He Will Release All Vaccine Doses After Taking Office'Pandemic Fatigue' Setting in? Here's How to Stay Safe and StrongCould High Pollen Levels Trigger Pelvic Pain?Record Number of COVID Cases, Deaths Reported in U.S.COVID Survivors' Plasma Might Prevent Worsening Illness in Older Patients: StudyAHA News: Dr. Dre Recovering From a Brain Aneurysm. What Is That?Certain Antibiotics Linked With Upped Risk for Deadly Aortic AneurysmsDeath Risk Nearly Doubles When COVID Strikes People With Heart FailureMore Infectious COVID Variant Likely Widespread in the U.S., Experts SayRed Cross Issues Call for More Blood Plasma to Treat COVID PatientsPediatricians' Group Says School Is Priority, With Proper Safety MeasuresMoves, Evictions Often Trigger Harmful Breaks in Health Care: StudyAllergic Reactions to COVID Vaccines Are Rare, Resolved on Site: CDCSurvey Shows Mental Woes Spiked in U.S. Pandemic's First MonthsYour 'To-Do' List as You Await a COVID VaccineSome Americans Can't Access Telemedicine, Study Shows Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews |
| |
by David H. Smith, Kimberly A. Quaid, Roger B, Dworkin, Gregory P. Gramelspacher, Judith A. Granbois, and Gail H. Vance Indiana University Press, 1998 Review by Christian Perring, Ph.D. on Dec 3rd 2002 
Early Warning contains 29
real cases involving ethical issues in presymptomatic testing for genetic disorders;
all but six of them concern Huntingtons Disease. Of course, identifying information is removed or altered to
preserve the anonymity of the patients.
The cases are put into four main groups:
·
cases where the testing of one person will result in
information a family member does not want to know
·
cases where people do not want to know about their own
risk for genetic disorders
·
cases where testing decisions concerning one individual
could have benefits or dangers for other people
·
cases of testing children and adults where the test may
be inappropriate or the subjects ability to consent is compromised.
The cases contain some technical discussion of genetic
diseases and testing information, but the book explains the relevant details
and should be accessible to a fairly general readership. There is a glossary of technical terms at
the end of the book. The authors do not
start out with any particular moral approach, but rather use a case-by-case
method, making no strong distinction between clear thinking and moral
theory. They certainly write in the
tradition of American medical ethics that respects the autonomy of competent
subjects, but they also write from the perspective of clinicians immersed in
the realities of everyday practice. The
authors do not always agree on how to proceed in each case, and their
disagreements are explained in the case discussions. The case studies vary in detail, from a short paragraph to two
pages, and the subsequent discussion varies in length from two to four
pages. The book ends with a length set
of guidelines extrapolated from the case analyses, and which include commentary
that refers to the cases in the main portion of the book.
Since the world of genetic medicine
is progressing so rapidly, it is inevitable that some of the medical
information in the book will be somewhat out-of-date, but the discussion of the
ethical issues should be useful to clinicians, patients, and students of
genetic ethics. The discussion of cases
is sensible and thoughtful, and normally covers most of the issues that need to
be included. Often the best way to
approach difficult cases is with an open mind and an ability to find creative
solutions. When faced with extremely
tough choices, one can also learn from such cases to create new policies for a
testing and counseling facility to avoid facing such difficult decisions in the
future. Its invaluable for ethicists
to work through the details of real cases, and even if readers do not always
agree with the recommendations of the authors, they will learn from the
cases.
Some readers may find that the fact
that the bulk of cases concern Huntingtons Disease makes the discussion
somewhat less useful if they are more concerned with other disorders such as
some forms of cancer, for example. The
book may also disappoint someone looking for simple answers to difficult
questions, because even with the list of guidelines at the end of the book, it
is still largely a matter of judgment when it comes to applying the guidelines
to real cases. Nevertheless, this
collection of cases probably provides the most thorough and thoughtful
available discussion of the ethical issues arising in presymptomatic genetic
testing. It will be very useful as a
resource to anyone teaching a course in genetic ethics.
© 2002 Christian Perring. All
rights reserved.
Christian Perring,
Ph.D., is Chair of the Philosophy Department at Dowling College, Long Island.
He is editor of Metapsychology Online Review. His main research is on
philosophical issues in psychiatry. He is especially interested in exploring
how philosophers can play a greater role in public life, and he is keen to help
foster communication between philosophers, mental health professionals, and the
general public.
|