|
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest NewsEven Small Reductions in Air Pollution Help The HeartHigh Costs Lead Millions of Americans to Shop Abroad for Rx DrugsPandemic Hits Primary Care Practices Hard Across the U.S.: StudyOne-Time Treatment Eases Parkinson's -- in MiceAHA News: Here's What Doctors Know About Immunizations Right Now – You Still Need ThemDoctors' Choice of Anesthesia Could Help Curb Climate ChangeTough State Gun Laws Help Save Lives: StudyBlood Donors Will Get Results of Coronavirus Antibody Test, Red Cross SaysCOVID Got You Scared of Performing CPR? Study Finds Infection Risk Is LowFor Stressed-Out Black Americans, Mental Health Care Often Hard to Come ByHealthDay In-Depth
The AI Revolution: For Patients, Promise and Challenges Ahead">HealthDay In-Depth
The AI Revolution: For Patients, Promise and Challenges AheadWomen Still Left Out of Much Medical ResearchHealthDay In-Depth
The AI Revolution: Robots Already Helping Humans Deliver Better Care">HealthDay In-Depth
The AI Revolution: Robots Already Helping Humans Deliver Better CareHealthDay In-Depth
The AI Revolution: Giving Docs a Diagnostic Assist">HealthDay In-Depth
The AI Revolution: Giving Docs a Diagnostic AssistAHA News: Calorie Data on Menus Could Generate Significant Health, Economic BenefitsPandemic Has Left Nearly 43 Million Americans Without WorkPeople Are Avoiding the ER During COVID-19 Crisis at Their Peril: StudyAs Postponed Surgeries Resume, Can U.S. Hospitals Handle the Strain?Most Americans Still More Worried About COVID-19 Spread Than the EconomyBig Need for Blood Donations as Postponed Surgeries ResumeEmergency Transport Can Surprise Many With Big BillsOnly Half of Americans Say They'd Get a Coronavirus Vaccine: SurveyIf Prescribed Opioids for Pain, Ask Lots of Questions: FDAState Texting Bans Are Saving Teen Drivers' LivesMillions of Older Americans Can't Get Enough FoodLayoffs and Losses: COVID-19 Leaves U.S. Hospitals in Financial CrisisFDA Goes After Unproven COVID-19 Antibody TestsDuring Droughts, Many Poor Americans Will Lack Clean Tap Water: StudyDid the Movie 'Joker' Reinforce Prejudice Against Mentally Ill?AHA News: How to Get the Most Out of Health AppsCoronavirus Conspiracy Theories Abound, and They Could Cause Real HarmAHA News: Health Emergency? Don't Hesitate to Get HelpAn Expert's Guide to Fact-Checking Coronavirus Info OnlineRacial, Ethnic Gaps in Insurance Put Moms, Babies at Risk: StudyCelebrity Suicides Spawn 'Copycat' Tragedies, Study ShowsVaccine Myths Widespread on the Web, Especially Facebook: Study
The Doctor Gap: In Areas of Greatest Need, Primary Care Is a Team Effort">
The Doctor Gap: In Areas of Greatest Need, Primary Care Is a Team EffortThe Doctor Gap: Where Are All the Mental Health Care Providers?New, Graphic Health Warnings Coming for U.S. Cigarette PacksWith New Boost From Medicare, 'Telemedicine' Steps Up to Fight CoronavirusThe Doctor Gap: In Rural America, It's All Hands on DeckThe Doctor Gap: A Training Program for Country-Doc WannabesDon't Believe All the 'Science' on CBD ProductsMany Car Crash Deaths Involve Alcohol Levels Below Legal Limit: StudyThe Doctor Gap: Does America Have a Physician Shortage?12 Weeks of Paid Maternity Leave Benefits Everyone: StudyVaping Videos Soaring on YouTubeU.S. Blood Donors Needed in Face of COVID-19 CrisisIt's Tough for Clinical Trial Participants to Learn ResultsBogus Coronavirus 'Meds' Targeted by FDA Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews |
| |
by Onora O'Neill Cambridge University Press, 2002 Review by Berel Dov Lerner, Ph.D. on Nov 19th 2002 
Onora
O’Neill is wary of suspicion. In her
professional capacity as an academic philosopher, she has pursued this theme in
regards to medical ethics. In the
present extremely brief volume (108 uncramped pages), O'Neill offers a quick
and non-technical overview of her thoughts on the wider phenomena of trust and
distrust in contemporary Western society, particularly in the U.K.
Apparent
signs of distrust are not hard to find. Public opinion polls seem to indicate
that we have lost faith in practically all of our major institutions. Patients question their physician’s medical
advice, citizens lack confidence in the abilities and honesty of politicians
and government agencies, and investors are jaded by the scandals that shake the
financial world. Are we then poised on
the brink of some paralyzing crisis of confidence?
O’Neill
points out that there is something false about our distrust. After all, practically everyone continues to
seek treatment in hospitals, educate their children in schools, and call upon
the police for protection. Although suspicion
is fashionable, it is rarely deep enough to keep people from depending on the
institutions of society in their everyday lives.
Our
distrust, she argues, is superficial because it is unreasonable. It is childish and utopian to withhold trust
until every possibility of deception has been stamped out. However, the news media consistently blow
our societies’ occasional scandals out of all proportion, creating the
impression of a general failure of professional ethics. Ironically, pollsters
find that the news media themselves constitute perhaps the least trusted institution
of all.
Faced
with charges of deception, modern institutions adopt the panacea of formalized schemes
of accountability. Hospitals, schools and government agencies
devote ever-larger portions of their budgets towards apologizing for how they
dispose of their budgets. Professionals
find themselves spending more time proving the quality of their work to
bureaucrats, and less time actually serving the public. Of course, these systems of accountability
must be amenable to quantification. They
must produce streams of bureaucracy-friendly information, which often reflect
nothing or little of the actual quality of work being monitored. Worst of all, accountability schemes can actually
distort people’s professional judgment.
Instead of trying to actually do their best, people working under a
strict regime of accountability must gear their performance towards the fulfillment
of artificial, and often irrelevant, official criteria of efficiency.
At
the end of the day, no system of bureaucratic controls can ever dispel our fear
of deception. In fact, the spotlights
and microscopes of intimate regulation create pressures for deception that did
not exist previously; ask enough questions, and you can turn anyone into a liar.
We end up flooded with information regarding people’s performance, but lack any
guaranty of its accuracy. Who can vouch
for the diligence of inspectors and the veracity of audits? Today’s common wisdom would seem to suggest
that we must set up an infinite regress of inspectors, each looking over the
other’s shoulder.
O'Neill
proposes that we act to restore trust by dismantling the rampant accountability-inquisition
and by channeling our attention to the reform of the media. Journalism demands that every institution be
held accountable, excepting itself.
Rumor, opinion and fact mix freely on the pages of our newspapers. (Although I would say this is perhaps truer
of the British than American press). No
one seems to care whether headlines correctly reflect the content of
articles. O'Neill does not offer a
specific plan of action, but she would like to see journalists and news
organizations reveal their monetary sources, as well as their news sources. In a nutshell, she makes one simple and
obviously justified demand of journalists: That they actually offer some kind
of assessable evidence for the veracity of the stories they tell. Isn’t it remarkable that the press has never
demanded that of itself?
© 2002 Berel Dov Lerner
Born
in Washington, D.C., Berel Dov Lerner studied at Johns Hopkins and the University
of Chicago, before becoming a member of Kibbutz Sheluhot in Israel’s Beit Shean
Valley. He completed his Ph.D. at Tel-Aviv
University, and currently teaches philosophy at the Western Galilee Academic
College. His first book, Rules,
Magic and Instrumental Reason was published last year by Routledge.
|
