|Basic InformationLatest News|One-Quarter With Early Breast Cancer Strongly Considers CPMFDA Approves New Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaNew Treatment Approved for Deadly Blood CancerHigh-Cal Foods May Raise Cancer Risk in Women, Even Without Weight GainAlternative Medicine Alone as Cancer Treatment Linked to Lowered SurvivalPerceived Social Support Lower for Cancer Caregivers Vs PatientsCan a Blood Test Detect a Range of Cancers Earlier?Heart Risks May Rise After Cancer DiagnosisCaregivers Have a Worse View of Cancer Patients' Functional StatusShort-Term Risk of Arterial Embolism Up in Cancer PatientsEndometrial Ablation Doesn't Increase Cancer RiskResearchers ID Genes in Mice That Cause Aggressive Brain CancerMultigene Panel Tests Can ID Hereditary Kidney CancerHospital Volume, Quality Impact Survival in Ovarian CancerPatient Profile Impacts QOL With Radiation Tx in Head, Neck CancerAntiperspirant Use Seems Safe During Breast Cancer Treatment: StudyOpioid Prescription Rates Higher in Cancer SurvivorsCancer Takes Financial Toll, Even With InsuranceFor Cancer Patients in the ER, Delirium Linked to Poor OutcomesBlood Test Can Screen for Rare Sinus Cancer, Study FindsColorectal Cancer Mortality Rates Down in Blacks, Up in WhitesDeaths From Colon Cancer Up Among Younger White AmericansOsteoporosis Meds Up BMD in Nonmetastatic Prostate CancerIntervention May Cut Muscle Loss From RT for Head & Neck CancerNot All 80-, 90-Year-Olds With Rectal Cancer Are TreatedChildhood Cancer Radiation May Cause Unwanted Gene Mutation in SomeNew Treatment Approved for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaYoung Cancer Survivors Struggle to Resume Social ActivitiesIdhifa Approved for Some With Acute Myeloid LeukemiaBreast-Feeding Lowers Mom's Breast Cancer Risk: StudyReview: Positive Link for Alcohol, Nonmelanoma Skin CancerChemo Plus Hyperthermia Active in Advanced Pancreatic CancerThyroid Cancer Tied to Regular Thyroxine Use in HypothyroidismInterval Training Cuts CVD Risk in Testicular Cancer SurvivorsTotal, Saturated Fat Linked to Increased Risk of Lung CancerTreatment Costs Can Be Another Blow to Cancer PatientsLack of Training Linked to Cancer Patient Caregiver BurdenMelanoma Isn't the Only Serious Skin CancerMany With Cancer Hospitalized, Undergo Imaging at End of Life$100 Sweetens the Pot for a ColonoscopyVascular Targeted Photodynamic Tx Aids Low-Risk Prostate CancerObesity in Teen Years Tied to Colon Cancer Risk in AdulthoodASCO Addresses Cancer Drug PricingSenator McCain Faces a Tough Cancer FoeMore Patients OK'd for Cancer Trials Under Obamacare: StudyInsured, But Still Barred From Top-Tier Cancer CentersMany Terminal Cancer Patients Remain in DenialSingle-Dose PCV13 Immunogenic, Safe in Pediatric OncologyDoctors' Group Offers Ideas for Easing Cancer Costs'Nipple-Sparing' Mastectomies Don't Raise Odds of Cancer's Return: StudyLinksBook ReviewsSelf-Help Groups
Second Cancers Deadlier for Younger People: Study
by -- Robert Preidt
Updated: Apr 20th 2017
THURSDAY, April 20, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- When a second cancer strikes, it tends to be far more deadly in the young, a new study reveals.
The findings may help explain the poor outcomes of younger cancer patients overall, the researchers added.
The researchers also found that survival odds for nearly all types of cancer are better for an initial cancer than for a second, unrelated cancer. That difference is greatest among patients younger than 40, the study authors said.
"Although the increased incidence of second cancers is well known among cancer survivors, less is known about outcomes of these cancers or the influence of age," said study author Theresa Keegan.
Keegan is a cancer epidemiologist at the University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center.
The researchers analyzed 1992-2008 data on more than 1 million cancer patients of all ages in the United States. They then looked for second cancers, meaning a new cancer, not a recurrence.
They found that the five-year survival rate for children and young adults was 80 percent after a first cancer. However, it dropped to 47 percent for children and 60 percent for young adults in cases of second cancers, Keegan and her colleagues said in a university news release.
Meanwhile, survival rates in older adults were 70 percent and 61 percent, respectively.
When the researchers focused on the 14 most common cancer types that affect young adults, they found that for all but two, there were significant survival differences depending on whether it was a first or second cancer.
For example, the five-year survival rate for young adults with acute myeloid leukemia was 57 percent if it was a first cancer, but only 29 percent if it was a second cancer. The five-year survival rate for young adult women with breast cancer was 81 percent if it was a first cancer but only 63 percent if it was a second cancer.
It's not clear why younger patients tend to do worse than older patients with the same second cancers.
But the researchers suggested several possible reasons, including worse response to treatment, limitations on the types or doses of treatments that they can receive as a result of prior cancer treatment, or reduced physical reserves that lower their ability to tolerate treatment.
Mental health and social issues may also be factors.
"These younger people don't have all the support or resources they need," said study co-author Melanie Goldfarb.
"They may not have adequate insurance, or they may get lost in the system. They may suffer from depression, which can contribute to their overall health and worsen their cancer outcome," added Goldfarb, an endocrine surgeon at John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, Calif.
The study was published April 20 in the journal JAMA Oncology.
The American Cancer Society has more on second cancers.
This article: Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.