611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

Health Choice Integrated Care crisis Line
1-877-756-4090

NurseWise 24-Hour Crisis Line
1-866-495-6735

NAZCARE Warm Line
1-888-404-5530



SEABHS
611 W. Union Street
Benson, AZ 85602
(520) 586-0800

NurseWise 24-Hr Crisis Line
1-866-495-6735

NAZCARE Warm Line
1-888-404-5530


powered by centersite dot net

Getting Started
Here are some forms to get started. These can be printed and brought with you so that you can pre-fill out some known info ahead of time. More...


Medical Disorders
Resources
Basic InformationLookupsLatest News
Health Tip: Protect Yourself Against Breast CancerSkip Opioid Treatment for Migraine in the ERPPI Use Linked to Increased Risk of Ischemic Stroke, MINew Genes Linked to Restless Legs SyndromeAvoiding Alcohol Helps the Heart Beat Better2 Million Americans May Have Arsenic in Their Well WaterFirefighters Exposed to Carcinogens Through the SkinNewer Blood Thinners May Not Bring Higher Bleeding RiskScoliosis Screenings Can Help Catch Spine Problem EarlyArthritis Can Strike ChildrenHealth Tip: Relieve Ear Pressure While FlyingBlack Children Missing Out on Eczema TreatmentNew Framework Guides Tx Decisions for Atopic DermatitisHealth Tip: Recognizing SepsisAround the World, Too Little Relief for PainNearly 4 in 10 U.S. Adults Now ObeseFDA Panel Supports Gene Therapy for Kids With Rare Eye Disease30-Day Mortality Lower With Female SurgeonsDirect Primary Care May Fill Niche for Uninsured3 Factors That Could Raise Your Risk of Bloodstream InfectionStroke Risk Factors Are RisingTwo Ebola Vaccines Spur Lasting Immune ResponseHormone Therapy May Be OK for Women With MigrainesMigraine MattersMedial Temporal Lobe Surgery Linked to Prevalence of TinnitusHigher Levels of Fungus ID'd in Patients With Crohn'sWhere There's Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Disease May FollowAntibiotic Use Not Linked to Islet, Celiac Disease AutoimmunitySome U.S. Olympians Got West Nile in Brazil, But Not ZikaPenicillin Misconceptions May Raise Post-Op Infection RiskHate UTIs? One Simple Step Can Cut the RiskIDSA: Retail Meat May Be a Transmission Source for UTIsLonger Anesthesia Duration Tied to More Surgical ComplicationsFirst Test to Detect Zika in Blood Donations ApprovedHealth Tip: Learn Symptoms of Childhood SinusitisLimiting 'Cold Time' Could Make More Organs Available for TransplantHealth Literacy Linked to Length of Stay After Abdominal SurgeryZika Vaccine Works in Early Human TrialHealth Tip: Understanding Loud Noise and Hearing LossAllergy Relief Do's and Don'tsPatient Factors Differ for Surgical, All-Cause ReadmissionComing Soon: A Faster Test for Antibiotics Against UTIs?Antibody Injections in Pregnancy Might Shield Fetus From ZikaHealth Tip: Giving BloodMore U.S. Measles Cases From No Vaccine vs. Imported DiseaseHigh Epsom Salt Intake Can Lead to Severe Liver InjuryTattoo Pigment Hypersensitivity Can Mimic LymphomaObesity Linked to 13 Types of CancerBlood Thinners Can Come With Dangerous Side EffectsMeasles Making a Comeback in the United States
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Cancer
Men's Health
Women's Health

Review: Interventions Don't Promote Exercise in Rural Adults


HealthDay News
Updated: Apr 19th 2017

new article illustration

WEDNESDAY, April 19, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Interventions to promote physical activity (PA) among adults have no effect in rural communities, according to a review published online April 11 in Obesity Reviews.

Verity Cleland, Ph.D., from the University of Tasmania in Australia, and colleagues reviewed published evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to increase PA and/or decrease sedentary behavior (SB) among rural adults. Data from 13 studies (4,848 participants) were included in the qualitative synthesis and data from 12 studies (4,820 participants) were included in the meta-analysis.

All studies included interventions to increase PA. The researchers found that there was no effect on PA (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.11; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], −0.04 to 0.25) or SB (SMD, 0.07; 95 percent CI, −0.33 to 0.20) overall. Effects were seen in favor of the intervention in PA subgroup analysis for studies employing objective outcome measures (SMD, 0.65; 95 percent CI, 0.30 to 1.00), while there were no effects in favor in studies using self-reported measures (SMD, 0.00; 95 percent CI, −0.11 to 0.10).

"This review highlights significant gaps in our understanding of how best to promote PA and reduce SB among rural adults," the authors write. "The absence of interventions to decrease SB is of concern, with immediate action required to address this large knowledge gap."

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)